querent

Spam yourself with math PhD qualifying-exam questions.

Showing 351–360 of 816
Stanford Fall 2009, 3 Real analysis, weak derivatives, absolute continuity

Let 𝑓,π‘”βˆˆπΏ1(⊀), ⊀=ℝ/(2πœ‹β„€), and assume that for any πœ“βˆˆπΆβˆž(⊀),

βˆ«π‘“(𝑑)πœ“β€²(𝑑)d𝑑=βˆ’βˆ«π‘”(𝑑)πœ“(𝑑)d𝑑.

(If this holds, it is common to say that "𝑔 is a weak derivative of 𝑓".) Prove that 𝑓 is absolutely continuous and 𝑓′=𝑔 a.e.

Stanford Fall 2009, 3 Real analysis, Volterra operator, spectral radius

For π‘“βˆˆπΆ([0,1]), π‘₯∈[0,1], let (𝑇𝑓)(π‘₯) be given by

(𝑇𝑓)(π‘₯)=∫0π‘₯𝑓(𝑦)d𝑦.

Show that 𝑇:𝐢([0,1])→𝐢([0,1]) is bounded, find (with proof) ‖𝑇‖ and the spectral radius of 𝑇.

Stanford Fall 2009, 4 Real analysis, compact operators, adjoint operators

Suppose that 𝑋,π‘Œ are Banach spaces, π‘‡βˆˆβ„’οΈ€(𝑋,π‘Œ) is compact.

(a) If π‘†βˆˆβ„’οΈ€(𝑋,𝑋), π‘…βˆˆβ„’οΈ€(π‘Œ,π‘Œ), show that 𝑇𝑆,π‘…π‘‡βˆˆβ„’οΈ€(𝑋,π‘Œ) are compact.

(b) Show that π‘‡βˆ—βˆˆβ„’οΈ€(π‘Œβˆ—,π‘‹βˆ—) is compact.

Stanford Fall 2009, 4 Real analysis, locally convex spaces, seminorms, FrΓ©chet spaces

Suppose that 𝑋 is a locally convex vector space with topology 𝒯︀ generated by a family {πœŒπ‘Ž:π‘Žβˆˆπ΄} of seminorms.

(a) If β€–β‹…β€– is a continuous seminorm on 𝑋, show that there exist π‘Ž1,…,π‘Žπ‘›βˆˆπ΄ and 𝐢>0, such that β€–π‘₯‖≀𝐢(πœŒπ‘Ž1(π‘₯)+…+πœŒπ‘Žπ‘›(π‘₯)) for all π‘₯βˆˆπ‘‹.

(b) Let 𝑋=𝐢∞(⊀), ⊀=ℝ/(2πœ‹β„€). Show that 𝑋 does not have a norm generating its standard topology (given by {πœŒπ‘˜=β€–β‹…β€–πΆπ‘˜:π‘˜β‰₯0,π‘˜βˆˆβ„€}).

Stanford Fall 2009, 5 Real analysis, uniform convexity, weak convergence, Banach spaces

A Banach space 𝐡 is uniformly convex if for every πœ€βˆˆ(0,1) there exists πœ‚<1 such that if π‘₯,π‘¦βˆˆπ΅, β€–π‘₯β€–=‖𝑦‖=1 and β€–π‘₯βˆ’π‘¦β€–>2πœ€ then β€–12(π‘₯+𝑦)β€–<πœ‚.

Let 𝐡 be a uniformly convex Banach space.

(a) Assume that π‘₯π‘›βˆˆπ΅ for 𝑛=1,2,… and π‘₯𝑛→π‘₯0 in the weak topology, and β€–π‘₯𝑛‖→‖π‘₯0β€–. Prove that π‘₯𝑛→π‘₯0 in norm.

Hint: Assume that {π‘₯𝑛} is not a Cauchy sequence, and for suitable pairs 𝑛𝑗,π‘šπ‘—, 𝑛𝑗<π‘šπ‘—, π‘›π‘—β†’βˆž, consider 𝑦𝑗=(π‘₯𝑛𝑗+π‘₯π‘šπ‘—)/2.

(b) Give an example that the statement in (a) is false for general Banach spaces.

Stanford Fall 2009, 5 Real analysis, Fourier transform, uncertainty principle, Schwartz functions

Let 𝑓:ℝ→ℂ be a Schwartz function (i.e. 𝑓 is 𝐢∞ and sup|π‘₯𝑁dπ‘˜π‘“dπ‘₯π‘˜|<∞ for all 𝑁 and π‘˜) satisfying βˆ«β„|𝑓(π‘₯)|2dπ‘₯=1. Let 𝑓̂(𝑦)=12πœ‹βˆ«β„π‘’βˆ’π‘–π‘₯𝑦𝑓(π‘₯)dπ‘₯ denote the Fourier transform of 𝑓.

(a) Show that

(βˆ«β„(π‘₯βˆ’π‘₯0)2|𝑓(π‘₯)|2dπ‘₯)(βˆ«β„(π‘¦βˆ’π‘¦0)2|𝑓̂(𝑦)|2d𝑦)β‰₯14

for all π‘₯0,𝑦0βˆˆβ„.

Hint: You may find it easier to reduce to, and then work with, the case π‘₯0=𝑦0=0.

(b) Suppose that the equality sign holds in (a). Show that there exists a real number πœ†>0 and a complex number 𝑐 such that |𝑐|=1 and

𝑓(π‘₯)=𝑐(πœ‹πœ†)βˆ’1/4exp(βˆ’(π‘₯βˆ’π‘₯0)22πœ†+𝑖π‘₯𝑦0)

for all π‘₯βˆˆβ„.

Stanford Fall 2010, 1 Real analysis, uniform boundedness, bounded operators

Suppose (𝑋,‖⋅‖𝑋), (π‘Œ,β€–β‹…β€–π‘Œ) are Banach spaces, and π‘Œ is a subspace of 𝑋 with the inclusion πœ„:π‘Œβ†’π‘‹ continuous in the respective Banach space topologies. Suppose that π‘‡π‘›βˆˆβ„’οΈ€(𝑋) for π‘›βˆˆβ„•. Suppose moreover that for each π‘₯βˆˆπ‘‹ and π‘›βˆˆβ„• one has 𝑇𝑛π‘₯βˆˆπ‘Œ, and in addition that for each π‘₯βˆˆπ‘‹ there exists 𝐢 (independent of 𝑛) such that ‖𝑇𝑛π‘₯β€–π‘Œβ‰€πΆ. Show that for all 𝑛, π‘‡π‘›βˆˆβ„’οΈ€(𝑋,π‘Œ), and show that there exists 𝐢 such that for all 𝑛 one has ‖𝑇𝑛‖ℒ︀(𝑋,π‘Œ)≀𝐢.

Stanford Fall 2010, 1 Real analysis, Fourier transform, analytic continuation, trigonometric polynomials

Two short problems:

(a) Suppose that 𝑓 is a compactly supported continuous function on ℝ𝑛 (i.e. 𝑓 vanishes outside a compact set), and suppose that its Fourier transform 𝑓̂, given by 𝑓̂(πœ‰)=βˆ«β„π‘›π‘’βˆ’π‘–π‘₯β‹…πœ‰π‘“(π‘₯)dπ‘₯, vanishes on a non-empty open set. Show that 𝑓 is identically 0.

(b) Let ⊀=ℝ/(2πœ‹β„€), 1<𝑝<∞. Suppose that β„ŽβˆˆπΏπ‘(⊀), β„Ž is non-zero a.e., and let

𝑉={π‘ƒβ„Ž:𝑃a trigonometric polynomial}βŠ‚πΏπ‘(⊀).

Show that 𝑉 is dense in 𝐿𝑝(⊀).

Stanford Fall 2010, 2 Real analysis, weak sequential compactness, Lp spaces, reflexivity

Consider the spaces 𝐿𝑝([0,1]), 1≀𝑝<∞. For which 𝑝 is the unit ball, {π‘“βˆˆπΏπ‘:‖𝑓‖𝐿𝑝≀1}, weakly sequentially compact, i.e. for which 𝑝 is it true that if {𝑓𝑛}𝑛=1∞ is a sequence in the unit ball in 𝐿𝑝 then it has a weakly convergent subsequence? For each 𝑝, either prove or disprove weak sequential compactness.

Stanford Fall 2010, 2 Real analysis, sequence spaces, density

Let 𝑋 denote the vector space of all sequences {π‘Žπ‘›:π‘›βˆˆβ„•} with βˆ‘π‘›=1βˆžπ‘›|π‘Žπ‘›|2<∞.

(a) Prove or disprove: the set 𝑋 is a dense subset of β„“2(β„•).

(b) Prove or disprove: the set 𝑋 is a dense subset of β„“βˆž(β„•).

Questions per page