querent

Spam yourself with math PhD qualifying-exam questions.

Showing 621–630 of 816
Stanford Spring 2016, 5 Real analysis, Fourier series, HΓΆlder continuity

Let πœ‘:ℝ→ℂ be 2πœ‹-periodic and HΓΆlder continuous with exponent 𝛼. Let 𝑐𝑛=12πœ‹βˆ«βˆ’πœ‹πœ‹πœ‘(π‘₯)π‘’βˆ’π‘–π‘›π‘₯dπ‘₯ denote the 𝑛-th Fourier coefficient of πœ‘.

(a) Show that there exists 𝐢>0 such that

βˆ‘π‘›=βˆ’βˆžβˆž(1βˆ’cos(π‘›β„Ž))|𝑐𝑛|2=14πœ‹βˆ«βˆ’πœ‹πœ‹|πœ‘(π‘₯+β„Ž)βˆ’πœ‘(π‘₯)|2≀𝐢|β„Ž|2𝛼

for each β„Žβˆˆβ„.

(b) Suppose now that 𝛼>1/2. Show that βˆ‘π‘›=βˆ’βˆžβˆž|𝑐𝑛|<∞.

Stanford Spring 2017, 1 Real analysis, Lp spaces, differentiability

Two short problems.

(a) Does the fact that limπ‘Žβ†’0βˆ«π‘Ž1𝑓dπ‘₯ exists guarantee that π‘“βˆˆπΏ1[0,1]? Prove this or give a counterexample.

(b) Suppose that 𝑓:ℝ→ℝ and for each π‘₯βˆˆβ„ there exists a quadratic polynomial 𝑃π‘₯, 𝑃π‘₯(𝑦)=π‘Žπ‘₯(π‘¦βˆ’π‘₯)2+𝑏π‘₯(π‘¦βˆ’π‘₯)+𝑐π‘₯, such that lim𝑦→π‘₯|π‘¦βˆ’π‘₯|βˆ’2|𝑓(𝑦)βˆ’π‘ƒπ‘₯(𝑦)|=0. Does this imply that 𝑓 is twice differentiable? Prove this or give a counterexample.

Stanford Spring 2017, 1 Real analysis, weak topology, Banach spaces

Two short problems.

(a) Suppose that 𝑋 is a Banach space. Show that every closed subspace of 𝑋 (closed with respect to the norm topology) is weakly closed.

(b) Let 𝑋,π‘Œ,𝑍 be Banach spaces, 𝑇:π‘‹β†’π‘Œ, 𝑆:π‘Œβ†’π‘ be linear maps. Suppose π‘†βˆ˜π‘‡ is bounded and 𝑆 is both bounded and injective. Show that 𝑇 is bounded.

Stanford Spring 2017, 2 Real analysis, strong operator topology, locally convex spaces, continuity of translation

Let 𝑇𝑑:𝐿2(ℝ)→𝐿2(ℝ), π‘‘βˆˆβ„, be the operator given by (𝑇𝑑𝑓)(π‘₯)=𝑓(π‘₯βˆ’π‘‘).

(a) Suppose that β€–π‘‡π‘‘βˆ’π‘‡π‘ β€–<2, where the norm is that of β„’οΈ€(𝐿2(ℝ)), the space of bounded operators on 𝐿2(ℝ). Show that 𝑑=𝑠.

(b) Give (with proof) a locally convex topology on β„’οΈ€(𝐿2(ℝ)) in which the map β„βˆ‹π‘‘β†¦π‘‡π‘‘βˆˆβ„’οΈ€(𝐿2(ℝ)) is continuous.

Stanford Spring 2017, 2 Real analysis, measurable functions, Lebesgue measure

Let {𝑓𝑛}π‘›βˆˆβ„• be a sequence of measurable functions on a measurable space (𝐸,β„°οΈ€). Show that the following functions are also measurable: inf𝑛𝑓𝑛, sup𝑛𝑓𝑛, lim inf𝑛𝑓𝑛, lim sup𝑛𝑓𝑛. Show also that {π‘₯∈𝐸:𝑓𝑛(π‘₯)converges asπ‘›β†’βˆž}βˆˆβ„°οΈ€.

Stanford Spring 2017, 3 Real analysis, spectral theory, bounded operators

Let β„“βˆž, resp. β„“2, denote the vector spaces of bounded, resp. square summable, complex valued sequences with the standard norms.

(a) Let {π‘Žπ‘›}π‘›βˆˆβ„•βˆˆβ„“βˆž. Define 𝑇:β„“2β†’β„“2 by (𝑇π‘₯)𝑛=π‘Žπ‘›π‘₯𝑛. Find (with proof) 𝜎(𝑇) (the spectrum of 𝑇).

(b) Let 𝐾 be a closed bounded non-empty subset of β„‚. Show that there exist 𝐻 a Hilbert space and 𝑇:𝐻→𝐻 a bounded linear map such that 𝜎(𝑇)=𝐾.

Stanford Spring 2017, 3 Real analysis, FrΓ©chet spaces, seminorms, metrizability

Let 𝐢∞(⊀) denote the vector space of infinitely differentiable complex-valued functions on ⊀=ℝ/(2πœ‹β„€), and let , πœ‘βˆˆπΆβˆž(⊀), be the πΆπ‘˜ norm of πœ‘. Let 𝒯︀ be the weakest topology on 𝐢∞(⊀) in which the functions

π‘“π‘˜,πœ“(πœ‘)=β€–πœ‘βˆ’πœ“β€–πΆπ‘˜(⊀):𝐢∞(⊀)β†’[0,∞),

π‘˜β‰₯0, πœ“βˆˆπΆβˆž(⊀), are continuous.

(a) Show that 𝒯︀ is metrizable, and write down an explicit metric giving rise to the topology 𝒯︀.

(b) Show that there exists no norm β€–β‹…β€– on 𝐢∞(⊀) such that 𝒯︀ is the topology given by the norm β€–β‹…β€–.

Stanford Spring 2017, 4 Real analysis, Sobolev spaces, trace theorem

Let 𝐻1([0,∞)) (Sobolev space on the half line) denote the completion of 𝐢𝑐1([0,∞)) (𝐢1 functions on [0,∞) which vanish outside a compact set, but not necessarily at 0) in the norm ‖𝑓‖𝐻1([0,∞))=‖𝑓‖𝐿2([0,∞))+‖𝑓′‖𝐿2([0,∞)), and 𝐻1(ℝ) be the standard Sobolev space (consisting of functions in 𝐿2(ℝ) whose Fourier transform satisfies ∫(1+|πœ‰|2)|ℱ︀𝑓(πœ‰)|2dπœ‰<∞).

(a) Show that the restriction map 𝑅:𝐢𝑐1(ℝ)→𝐢𝑐1([0,∞)) extends to a continuous linear map (still denoted by 𝑅) 𝑅:𝐻1(ℝ)→𝐻1([0,∞)).

(b) Show that there is a continuous linear map 𝐸:𝐻1([0,∞))→𝐻1(ℝ) such that 𝑅𝐸=𝐼 (identity map).

Hint: Consider a map of the form 𝐸𝑓(π‘₯)=𝑓(π‘₯) when π‘₯β‰₯0, 𝐸𝑓(π‘₯)=βˆ‘π‘—=1π‘˜π‘Žπ‘—π‘“(βˆ’π‘—π‘₯) when π‘₯<0, where π‘˜ and π‘Žπ‘— are appropriately chosen.

Stanford Spring 2017, 4 Real analysis, stationary phase, oscillatory integrals

Suppose π‘“βˆˆπΆβˆž(ℝ𝑛) complex-valued with Im𝑓β‰₯0 and πΎβŠ†β„π‘› is compact. Suppose that for all points π‘₯∈𝐾 with Im𝑓(π‘₯)=0, the differential of 𝑓 does not vanish at π‘₯. Show that for all π‘’βˆˆπΆβˆž(ℝ𝑛) with support in 𝐾 and for all 𝑁β‰₯0 there is 𝐢>0 such that

|βˆ«π‘’π‘–πœ”π‘“(π‘₯)𝑒(π‘₯)dπ‘₯|β‰€πΆπœ”βˆ’π‘,πœ”>1.
Stanford Spring 2017, 5 Real analysis, compact operators, Fredholm operators, closed range

Suppose that 𝐴 is a bounded operator on a Hilbert space 𝐻 and 𝐾 is a compact operator on 𝐻.

(a) If 𝐴 has closed range, finite dimensional kernel and infinite dimensional cokernel, then show that 𝐴+𝐾 also has all the same properties.

(b) If 𝐴 has closed range, infinite dimensional kernel, finite dimensional cokernel, then show that 𝐴+𝐾 has the same properties.

(c) Is it true that if 𝐴 has closed range but kernel and cokernel both infinite dimensional, then 𝐴+𝐾 still has closed range? Prove or give a counterexample.

Questions per page